There’s Magic Ink & then there are it’s responses & extensions:
4lpine
’s notes on magic inkIf you fully design the graphics, interaction design is not necessary!? April 24, 2007
These are all worth reading. I also think the metaphor of ink is basically the wrong abstraction.
Let’s now follow two different insstitutions Urbit & The Center for Radical Atoms
Both of these are what I’ll refer to as “packet first” groups. Urbit is fundamentally interesting in an append-only global computer with a microcomputing langauge that is shardable across n-devices. It’s concerned, philosophically, with “pushing packets through a new internet”.
The Center for Radical Atoms started as the Tangible Media Group’s Tangible Bits. It is my estimation that the move to Radical Atoms
is really more about pushing a concept than moving away from bits. The atoms are still networked.
So what’s a universal bit? It’s a bit that can make it all the way from an implantable CGM to your phone (into your PAN) to a computer in the room (RPI, laptop, NAS server, w/e). Let’s stop here a moment & look around. If you’re a single bit, making its way “up”, then if you stopped here you’d be available to the WAN or WLAN network (e.g. localhost:1234/index.html
-> returns 1
). So that’s cool. But what if you wanted to keep going?
Let’s keep going up the powers of 10.
Documents
folder, Google Drive, Dropbox, personal NAS connected to the internet, w/e). Fundamentally you want the bit to be in the internet. So you push it either to your PSN or to a traditional web server. Now the bit lives at e.g. example.com
-> 1
.ESC
which actually does way more than just ISS but manages laser internet & the NASA NSN.The universal bit is only possible when you decouple data from its representation.