cwervo

Against Ink, Toward Universal Bits

Ink

There’s Magic Ink & then there are it’s responses & extensions:

These are all worth reading. I also think the metaphor of ink is basically the wrong abstraction.

Bits

Let’s now follow two different insstitutions Urbit & The Center for Radical Atoms

Both of these are what I’ll refer to as “packet first” groups. Urbit is fundamentally interesting in an append-only global computer with a microcomputing langauge that is shardable across n-devices. It’s concerned, philosophically, with “pushing packets through a new internet”.

The Center for Radical Atoms started as the Tangible Media Group’s Tangible Bits. It is my estimation that the move to Radical Atoms is really more about pushing a concept than moving away from bits. The atoms are still networked.

Universal Bits?

So what’s a universal bit? It’s a bit that can make it all the way from an implantable CGM to your phone (into your PAN) to a computer in the room (RPI, laptop, NAS server, w/e). Let’s stop here a moment & look around. If you’re a single bit, making its way “up”, then if you stopped here you’d be available to the WAN or WLAN network (e.g. localhost:1234/index.html -> returns 1). So that’s cool. But what if you wanted to keep going?

Let’s keep going up the powers of 10.

The universal bit is only possible when you decouple data from its representation.